Evidence stays attached
Each potential match should remain connected to the basis for including that person, so the team can inspect the reasoning rather than accept a list at face value.
Trust
See the evidence. Understand the gaps.
Daero is designed to support careful review, not replace it. A useful shortlist should make the basis for a match and the limits of the available evidence easier to inspect.
What a reviewable result should show.
Sources need context
Relevant public sources can help establish role and experience. They do not make coverage exhaustive, and they should be reviewed in context.
Uncertainty is visible
Missing, conflicting, or incomplete evidence is useful information. Daero should make those gaps easier to see during review.
Humans decide
Daero supports research and comparison. The final professional judgment, outreach decision, and use of any result remain with the team.
Accuracy and corrections.
The public site uses fictional sample profiles. It does not publish real expert records or invite decisions about real people.
Where an organization is named, it is used only as industry context and does not identify an actual employee, relationship, endorsement, or research result.
A correction process for real product records will be published with the relevant product workflow. Until then, do not treat the illustrative examples as research output.